Category: Non Infill Football Grass

  • Key Environmental Parameters for Non-Infill Artificial Turf

    When comparing products for European or American projects, it is more useful to request measurable test data than to rely on marketing language.

    1. Heavy Metals

    Testing may cover substances such as:

    • Lead (Pb)
    • Cadmium (Cd)
    • Mercury (Hg)
    • Chromium and other regulated elements
    • Arsenic, depending on the applicable testing protocol

    For sensitive applications such as schools and children’s facilities, buyers should request a current third-party chemical-safety report and verify the actual test method and applicable limits.

    For European projects, REACH compliance/SVHC screening can be particularly useful for identifying substances of concern.

    2. VOC and Formaldehyde

    Backing materials, coatings and adhesives can influence VOC emissions.

    A project specification may therefore request testing for:

    • Total VOC emissions
    • Formaldehyde
    • Benzene
    • Toluene
    • Xylene
    • Other regulated volatile compounds

    Rather than simply claiming “zero VOC,” a more credible specification is to provide a measured emission value under a clearly identified test method.

    3. PAHs and Phthalates

    Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and certain phthalates are frequently included in chemical-restriction testing for synthetic materials.

    For export projects, buyers should request documentation showing that the finished turf system meets the applicable restricted-substance requirements for the destination market.

    This is particularly important when turf is intended for:

    • Schools
    • Childcare facilities
    • Residential gardens
    • Rooftop terraces
    • Public recreation areas

    4. Recyclability

    Environmental performance does not end when the turf is installed.

    Traditional artificial turf can contain multiple materials, including yarn, primary backing, secondary backing, coatings and infill. Separating these materials at the end of the product’s service life can be challenging.

    A monomaterial or more easily separable system can therefore offer an advantage for recycling and end-of-life management.

    This is one area where the development of recyclable non-infill systems is becoming increasingly important.

  • What Environmental Standards Should Buyers Look For?

    There is no single universal “environmental certification for artificial turf.” Different markets use different regulations and testing systems.

    For European and international projects, commonly referenced frameworks include EU REACH, relevant product-chemical restrictions, VOC testing, heavy-metal testing, and independent laboratory assessments. Depending on the application, buyers may also request documentation relating to recyclability, recycled content, life-cycle performance, and restricted substances.

    For football facilities, FIFA’s current Football Turf Quality Programme evaluates much more than environmental characteristics. Its laboratory and field testing covers areas including playing performance, safety, durability, product composition, weather resistance and seam strength. FIFA also introduced requirements and testing developments relating to sustainability and recycled content in its newer football-turf framework.

    This means that a high-quality non-infill turf system should not be judged simply by whether the supplier uses the word “eco-friendly.”

  • Can You Combine Natural Grass and Non-Infill Turf?

    Yes. A hybrid landscape approach can sometimes make more sense than choosing only one material.

    For example:

    • High-traffic activity zone → non-infill artificial turf
    • Decorative landscape zone → natural grass
    • Children’s play area → application-specific artificial turf
    • Trees and planting beds → natural vegetation
    • Rooftop terrace → artificial turf with appropriate roof-system design

    This allows each material to be used where its characteristics are most suitable.


    Non-Infill Artificial Turf Brand to Consider: VivaTurf

    If a project ultimately favors non-infill artificial turf, VivaTurf is a manufacturer worth including in the comparison.

    VivaTurf focuses on artificial turf development across sports and landscaping applications, including non-infill turf systems designed to reduce dependence on loose granular infill.

    Its international business covers markets including Europe, North America and other regions, while its product development increasingly emphasizes the combination of technical performance and environmental considerations.

    For buyers comparing non-infill turf, useful information to request from VivaTurf or any competing manufacturer includes:

    • Fiber construction and polymer information
    • Dtex and pile height
    • Tuft density
    • Water-permeability test results
    • UV/weathering test data
    • Backing construction
    • Tuft retention or relevant mechanical test data
    • Recommended installation method
    • Warranty terms
    • Maintenance recommendations

    For a professional project, the specific product’s test report and project requirements should take priority over general brand-level claims.

  • What Technical Data Should You Compare?

    Which One Costs More?

    Looking only at installation cost can produce a misleading comparison.

    Non-infill artificial turf

    The major investment generally occurs at the beginning:

    Product + site preparation + installation

    After installation, routine costs are generally concentrated in cleaning, inspection and occasional repairs.

    Natural grass

    The initial installation may be less expensive in some situations, but recurring costs can include:

    Water + mowing + fertilizer + labor + weed/pest control + reseeding + soil management

    The appropriate comparison is therefore a lifecycle cost analysis, rather than simply comparing the initial installation quotation.

    For long-term projects, a useful model is to compare:

    Initial installation + annual maintenance + water + repairs + replacement/renovation over the planned service period


    What Technical Data Should You Compare?

    The two systems cannot be evaluated using identical parameters.

    For non-infill artificial turf

    ParameterWhy it matters
    Dtex / yarn constructionHelps describe the mass and construction of the synthetic yarn
    Pile heightInfluences appearance and surface characteristics
    Tuft densityRelevant to coverage, resilience and wear characteristics
    Water permeabilityImportant for drainage
    UV/weathering performanceRelevant to outdoor durability
    Tuft retention/backing strengthImportant for fiber anchoring
    Mass per unit areaRelevant to transportation, installation and certain structural applications

    A higher Dtex value by itself does not automatically mean a better or longer-lasting product. Yarn construction, density, polymer formulation and backing all need to be considered together.

    For natural grass

    ParameterWhy it matters
    Grass species/cultivarDetermines climate adaptation and growth characteristics
    Soil conditionInfluences root development and drainage
    Irrigation systemDetermines water-management efficiency
    DrainageImportant for root health and traffic tolerance
    Establishment rateIndicates how quickly a usable lawn can develop
    Traffic toleranceImportant for high-use areas
    Seasonal adaptationDetermines performance during hot, cold or dry periods

    This is why comparing an artificial turf brochure against a natural-grass supplier’s brochure does not provide a meaningful technical comparison.

  • What Happens After Rain?

    Non-Infill Artificial Turf

    A well-designed system can drain rainwater through the turf backing and underlying drainage structure.

    Recovery depends on:

    • Turf permeability
    • Backing design
    • Foundation
    • Surface slope
    • Drainage capacity
    • Rainfall intensity

    The absence of loose infill can also simplify surface maintenance after heavy rain.

    Natural Grass

    Natural grass can recover well after rain when the soil and drainage system are properly designed.

    However, saturated soil can become soft and vulnerable to:

    • Foot traffic
    • Compaction
    • Rutting
    • Mud formation
    • Turf damage

    This is particularly important on high-traffic lawns.


    Which One Is More Durable?

    It depends on how the surface is used.

    Non-infill artificial turf is designed to tolerate repeated mechanical traffic, but its service life is affected by:

    • Fiber quality
    • Fiber construction
    • Tuft density
    • UV exposure
    • Traffic intensity
    • Maintenance
    • Base stability
    • Installation quality

    Natural grass can regenerate because it is alive, but repeated traffic can exceed its recovery capacity.

    A heavily used lawn may therefore develop worn areas much faster than a lightly used ornamental lawn.

    For sports facilities, the comparison should be made using actual surface performance requirements and testing, rather than simply asking which material is “more durable.”

  • Maintenance: Artificial Turf vs. Natural Grass

    Natural grass follows a “grow and maintain” cycle

    A typical natural lawn may require:

    Planting → irrigation → mowing → fertilization → weed/pest management → aeration → seasonal recovery

    The exact programme varies considerably by grass species and climate.

    Non-infill turf follows a “install and maintain” cycle

    A typical artificial turf maintenance programme focuses on:

    Installation → cleaning → debris removal → drainage maintenance → localized repair

    This does not mean artificial turf is maintenance-free.

    Leaves, dirt, food, pet waste and other organic material still need to be removed, while drainage openings and seams should be inspected periodically.

    The difference is that maintenance is primarily surface and system maintenance rather than plant growth management.


    Water Consumption: Which Uses More Water?

    For many residential and landscaping applications, natural grass requires substantially more routine irrigation than artificial turf.

    However, the actual difference depends on:

    • Climate
    • Grass species
    • Irrigation efficiency
    • Rainfall
    • Lawn size
    • Seasonal conditions
    • Artificial turf cleaning requirements

    A non-infill lawn may require little routine irrigation, but it may still be rinsed periodically, especially in pet areas, dusty environments or hot climates.

    Therefore, “zero water” is not an appropriate universal claim.

    The more useful comparison is routine irrigation demand over the full operating period.

  • VivaTurf Non-Infill Artificial Turf: A Brand Worth Comparing

    If a project has a specific service-life target, VivaTurf is a manufacturer worth including in the procurement comparison.

    VivaTurf has developed non-infill turf systems for sports and landscaping applications, with product development focused on fiber construction, backing technology, drainage and long-term outdoor performance.

    The company has an international market presence spanning Europe, North America and other regions, while continuing to develop technologies related to non-infill and recyclable artificial turf systems.

    For customers comparing products based on durability, the most useful approach is to request the specific product’s technical documentation, including:

    • Yarn construction
    • Dtex
    • Tuft density
    • UV/weathering test data
    • Abrasion or wear test data where applicable
    • Tuft retention/backing strength
    • Water permeability
    • Recommended maintenance
    • Warranty conditions

    For professional projects, these product-specific documents are more useful than simply relying on a general statement that a turf product can “last 8 years” or “last 10 years.”

  • How Can You Extend the Life of Non-Infill Artificial Turf?

    Good maintenance does not make artificial turf last forever, but it can help preserve its intended performance.

    Keep the surface clean

    Remove:

    • Leaves
    • Mud
    • Organic debris
    • Food waste
    • Pet waste

    Accumulated debris can interfere with drainage and encourage biological growth.

    Keep drainage functioning

    Regularly inspect:

    • Drainage openings
    • Channels
    • Gutters
    • Low points

    Persistent standing water should be investigated rather than ignored.

    Avoid unnecessary chemical exposure

    Do not routinely use aggressive chemicals unless the manufacturer confirms compatibility.

    Control heavy localized traffic

    If one section receives substantially more traffic than the rest of the surface, appropriate maintenance and usage management can help reduce localized wear.

    Repair small defects early

    Small seam, edge or backing problems can become larger failures if they are left untreated.

  • What Should You Check Before Buying Long-Life Non-Infill Turf?

    A practical procurement checklist includes:

    1. Verify the actual product batch

    Make sure the test report corresponds to the product being supplied rather than a different model.

    2. Review weathering data

    Ask for the applicable UV/weathering test method and performance-retention results.

    3. Review mechanical performance

    Depending on the application, check relevant:

    • Abrasion/wear data
    • Tuft retention
    • Backing strength
    • Seam performance

    4. Put the warranty in writing

    The contract should clearly define:

    • Warranty period
    • Covered defects
    • Performance requirements
    • Maintenance obligations
    • Exclusions
    • Remedy

    5. Evaluate the installation

    Even a durable turf product can experience premature failure if the base, drainage, seams or perimeter fixing are poorly constructed.

  • Fiber Weight (DTEX): The Invisible Core of Strength

    DTEX is the ultimate metric for measuring the “quality” of the grass fiber. It doesn’t directly determine softness but dictates the fiber’s tensile strength, abrasion resistance, and recovery memory. Professional soccer synthetic grass typically has a DTEX value above 8000, with top-tier products exceeding 12000.

    Fundamental Impact on Durability:

    High-DTEX fibers are like sturdier “steel rebar,” with stronger molecular chains that resist:

    1.  Abrasion: Repeated scraping from cleats and friction from the ball.

    2.  UV Degradation: High-DTEX fibers usually have more stable polymer structures and better anti-aging properties.

    3.  Fatigue Fracture: Better ability to recover their original shape after repeated bending.

    A simple analogy: Two fibers of the same height, the 10000 DTEX one will have a much longer “lifespan” than the 6000 DTEX one, especially under sun, rain, and high-intensity use.

    Subtle Impact on Performance:

    Resilience: High-weight fibers have better shape memory, springing back faster after being compressed, maintaining a lush appearance and consistent performance over time.

    Support: It provides the substantial “content” for high density, together building a strong load-bearing network.

    Selection Guide:

    Treat DTEX as the most critical quality indicator. For any pitch intended for official matches or high-intensity training, do not accept products below 8000 DTEX.

    Beware of the “high pile height, low fiber weight” combination: This can lead to turf that looks full but has weak fibers prone to matting and rapid wear.

    Request raw material data: Reputable suppliers should be able to provide DTEX test reports for the fiber masterbatch.