Although both models feature a 25mm pile height and are designed for outdoor landscaping applications, they differ in turf density, color design, backing structure, and overall performance focus. The comparison table below highlights the key specifications and differences between M8225 and 26A-25.
| Feature | M8225 | 26A-25 |
| Pile Height | 25 mm | 25 mm |
| Material | PE+PP/12000 | PE+PP/8500 |
| Density | 17,800 stitches/m² | 16,800 stitches/m² |
| Weight | 2.46 kg/m² | 2.37 kg/m² |
| Color | Three-color | Two-color |
| Back Coating | XPU | Double-layer XPU |
| Backing Structure | Black-green anti-aging base + tear-resistant reinforced mesh | Black-green anti-aging base + tear-resistant reinforced mesh |
| Key Advantage | Higher density and fuller natural appearance | Enhanced fiber retention and practical installation performance |
| Recommended Focus | High-use areas requiring a dense, realistic look | Landscaping projects prioritizing easy handling and maintenance |
Density and Weight: Differences in Turf Fullness
M8225 features a higher density of 17,800 stitches/m², compared with the 16,800 stitches/m² for 26A-25. This creates a fuller and denser surface appearance, making M8225 a better fit for projects where a more natural and premium lawn effect is important. With a slightly heavier structure, it is also well suited for areas requiring frequent use.
Color Options: Three-Color vs. Two-Color Appearance
M8225 uses a three-color fiber blend to create more natural shade variations and a layered grass appearance. In comparison, 26A-25 uses a two-color design that delivers a clean and consistent look, making it a practical choice for general landscaping and decorative applications.
Back Coating: Fiber Retention and Durability
Both models use XPU coating and reinforced backing for outdoor durability. The 26A-25 features a double-layer XPU coating to improve fiber retention and reduce fiber shedding during cutting and installation, while M8225’s backing structure supports its denser fiber arrangement for stable long-term performance.
Leave a Reply