Non Infill Football Grass

Blog

  • Straight and Curly Fiber Combinations Can Improve Fiber Support

    Many advanced non-infill turf systems use combinations of straight and curly fibers.

    The two fiber types can perform complementary functions.

    Straight fibers

    They provide much of the vertical structure and help maintain the visual height and playing surface.

    Curly fibers

    They can provide additional lateral support and help fibers recover after mechanical loading.

    A balanced configuration can help distribute mechanical forces across multiple fibers rather than concentrating the load on individual fibers.

    This is one reason why fiber architecture may be more important than simply increasing tuft density.

    Wear Resistance and Anti-Layover Performance Are Closely Related

    Wear resistance should also be considered together with fiber recovery.

    Repeated foot traffic can cause fibers to bend repeatedly. If the material loses resilience or experiences permanent deformation, the turf may gradually develop localized layover.

    Permanent layover can increase contact between footwear and the fiber surface, potentially accelerating mechanical wear.

    Therefore, the following characteristics should be evaluated together:

    Abrasion resistance + resilience + fiber recovery + UV stability + tuft anchoring.

    This integrated approach is particularly important for football fields and other high-frequency sports facilities.

  • DTEX and Fiber Thickness: Important, But Not Simply “Higher Is Better”

    DTEX is commonly used to describe the linear density of synthetic fibers.

    In broadly comparable fiber systems, a higher linear density can provide greater material mass and potentially improve durability.

    However:

    Higher DTEX does not automatically mean better artificial turf.

    Excessive fiber weight can affect:

    • Foot feel
    • Ball interaction
    • Fiber recovery
    • System weight
    • Manufacturing cost
    • Overall field characteristics

    A properly engineered non-infill turf system therefore seeks an appropriate balance between:

    DTEX + fiber thickness + cross-sectional geometry + density + resilience.

    Fiber Cross-Sectional Design Can Improve Long-Term Performance

    The geometry of an artificial turf fiber can influence bending stiffness, resilience, load distribution, and recovery.

    Common engineered profiles include:

    • S-shaped fibers
    • C-shaped fibers
    • U-shaped fibers
    • Diamond-shaped fibers
    • Hollow profiles
    • Other three-dimensional engineered profiles

    Compared with simple flat fibers, engineered cross-sections can provide additional structural support and improve the way fibers respond to repeated loading.

    This is particularly relevant to non-infill turf because the system is designed to maintain its performance without relying on large quantities of particulate infill.

    A well-designed fiber therefore needs to provide a balance between:

    strength + flexibility + resilience + recovery.

  • Tuft Withdrawal Resistance Also Affects Long-Term Wear Performance

    Another important parameter is tuft withdrawal resistance, sometimes referred to as tuft pull-out strength.

    This measures the force required to remove a tuft of fibers from the backing system.

    It is different from fiber tensile strength.

    Performance ParameterWhat It Evaluates
    Fiber tensile strengthStrength of an individual fiber
    Fiber strength retentionFiber durability after aging or testing
    Tuft withdrawal resistanceSecurity of the entire tuft within the backing
    Tuft withdrawal retentionStability of the tuft anchoring system over time

    This distinction matters because a turf system can experience two different types of failure.

    Fiber breakage

    Repeated friction gradually damages the fiber until individual fibers break.

    Tuft loss

    Repeated mechanical forces gradually weaken the anchoring structure until an entire tuft is pulled from the backing.

    For this reason, a professional procurement specification should ideally evaluate both fiber durability and tuft anchoring performance.

    Fiber Material Is One of the Foundations of Wear Resistance

    The polymer formulation used for artificial turf fibers has a major influence on durability.

    Outdoor sports turf commonly uses polyethylene-based formulations, while selected systems may incorporate other polymers or polymer modifications to achieve specific combinations of:

    • Flexibility
    • Resilience
    • Abrasion resistance
    • UV stability
    • Weather resistance
    • Fiber strength

    High-performance formulations may incorporate carefully selected stabilizers and additives to improve resistance to UV exposure and thermal aging.

    However, buyers should be cautious about generalized claims such as “100% more wear resistant.”

    The most useful evidence is third-party testing performed on the actual product specification being purchased.

  • Fiber Strength Retention Is an Important Durability Indicator

    For sports-grade non-infill artificial turf, buyers should pay attention not only to the original fiber strength but also to fiber strength retention after accelerated aging and mechanical testing.

    Fiber tensile strength indicates the mechanical strength of an individual fiber.

    Fiber strength retention provides additional information about how well that fiber maintains its mechanical properties after exposure to:

    • UV radiation
    • Heat
    • Moisture
    • Repeated mechanical loading
    • Long-term environmental conditions

    For outdoor sports facilities, this distinction is particularly important.

    A fiber with high initial strength may not necessarily maintain the same performance after years of outdoor exposure.

    Therefore, international buyers should consider:

    Initial performance + aged performance + retention rate

    rather than relying exclusively on the initial laboratory value.

  • Abrasion Cycles: Useful, But Only When the Test Method Is Clear

    Some artificial turf manufacturers refer to abrasion results obtained using methods such as ASTM D3884, which is widely used for abrasion resistance evaluation of textile and related materials.

    However, ASTM D3884 should not automatically be interpreted as a universal artificial turf service-life standard.

    Test results can vary depending on:

    • Abrasive wheel type
    • Applied load
    • Rotation speed
    • Test duration
    • Sample preparation
    • Failure criteria

    Consequently, a statement such as:

    “Our artificial turf achieves 7,000 abrasion cycles and therefore lasts 10 years”

    would generally be too broad without additional evidence.

    For international procurement, buyers should ask:

    Which standard was used? What equipment was used? What were the test conditions? How was the endpoint determined?

    Only comparable test conditions allow abrasion results to be meaningfully compared.

    2. Simulated Wear Testing Is Particularly Relevant for Sports Turf

    For football fields, school sports facilities, training centers, and other high-use environments, simulated mechanical wear testing can provide useful information about long-term turf behavior.

    Testing systems such as Lisport-type mechanical wear testing, together with relevant European or international artificial turf test procedures, can simulate repeated mechanical loading and fiber interaction.

    Rather than focusing only on the number of cycles, buyers should examine the condition of the turf after testing.

    Important observations include:

    • Fiber breakage
    • Fiber deformation
    • Fiber recovery
    • Surface appearance
    • Mass loss
    • Fiber strength retention
    • Tuft withdrawal resistance retention
    • Backing integrity

    This leads to an important principle:

    The condition of the turf after simulated wear can be more informative than the cycle count itself.

    A product may tolerate a large number of cycles under a particular laboratory setup, but if its fibers lose significant strength or become permanently deformed, the result may have limited practical value.

  • How to Evaluate the Wear Resistance Index of Non-Infill Artificial Turf?

    The wear resistance index of non-infill artificial turf should not be judged by a single number. For buyers comparing products in Europe, North America, and other international markets, the most reliable approach is to evaluate the test method, abrasion cycles, fiber strength retention, tuft withdrawal resistance, UV-aging performance, and overall field performance together.

    Because different manufacturers may use different testing methods, a claimed “6,000” or “7,000” abrasion result is meaningful only when the testing standard, equipment, load, abrasive material, and evaluation method are clearly identified.

    For this reason, high-quality non-infill artificial turf should be assessed as a complete system rather than simply by its abrasion number.

    What Does the Wear Resistance Index Mean for Non-Infill Artificial Turf?

    Wear resistance describes how well artificial turf fibers withstand repeated mechanical friction and retain their structure and performance over time.

    Non-infill artificial turf does not rely on silica sand or rubber granules to support the fibers. Its long-term performance therefore depends more heavily on:

    • Fiber material and formulation
    • Fiber thickness and linear density
    • Fiber cross-sectional design
    • Straight and curly fiber configuration
    • Tufting quality
    • Primary and secondary backing construction
    • Tuft withdrawal resistance
    • UV and weathering resistance
    • Overall system design

    In real-world applications, insufficient wear resistance may gradually result in:

    • Fiber surface abrasion
    • Fiber breakage
    • Fiber shortening
    • Loss of resilience
    • Increased fiber layover
    • Reduced visual density
    • Tuft loss
    • Deterioration of overall playing performance

    Therefore, wear resistance should be evaluated together with fiber retention and structural durability, rather than treated as a single specification.

  • Why Consider VIVATURF Non-Infill Artificial Turf?

    If your project is looking for non-infill artificial turf for football, hockey, tennis, rugby, schools, community sports facilities or residential applications, VIVATURF is worth considering as an international supplier.

    Its non-infill product portfolio combines:

    • Non-infill system technology
    • International sports testing and certification experience
    • Recyclability-focused product development
    • Material and manufacturing quality control
    • International export experience
    • FIFA-related football turf expertise
    • Project-specific turf system solutions

    VIVATURF’s non-infill grass portfolio is designed for multiple sports applications, including soccer, hockey, tennis and rugby.

    For buyers who want to move beyond simply comparing pile height, density and price, VIVATURF offers a more system-oriented approach: evaluate yarn structure, anchoring, drainage, shock absorption, durability, chemical safety and end-of-life recyclability together.

    If environmental performance and technical reliability are both priorities, VIVATURF non-infill artificial turf can be a strong option to include in your international procurement shortlist.

  • Is Non-Infill Artificial Turf More Environmentally Friendly Than Infilled Turf?

    Potentially, but it depends on the complete product design.

    The strongest environmental case for non-infill turf comes from combining:

    No loose infill + low-emission materials + restricted-substance compliance + durable construction + recyclable design + responsible end-of-life management.

    Simply removing rubber infill does not automatically make a product sustainable.

    For international procurement, this distinction is important because sophisticated buyers increasingly evaluate the whole product life cycle, rather than focusing on one environmental claim.

    VIVATURF: Combining Non-Infill Technology With Sustainable Turf Development

    Among Chinese artificial-turf manufacturers expanding into international markets, VIVATURF has developed a particularly strong position in non-infill artificial turf and recyclable turf systems.

    According to VIVATURF’s current company information, the company has developed non-infill turf as a core technology area, exports products to more than 100 countries and regions, and has established production and R&D capabilities supporting international markets including Europe, the United States, Australia and Japan.

    VIVATURF also states that it has obtained more than 70 tests and certifications from organizations including SGS, Labosport, NSCC and Sports Labs, and is a FIFA field-certification supplier. Its certification portfolio includes FIFA, ISO and FIH-related credentials.

    More importantly for sustainable turf development, VIVATURF’s VRG recyclable non-infill artificial turf system is designed around recyclability and the reduction of loose infill materials. The company reports that its recyclable non-infill football system passed FIFA Basic testing at a project in Tianjin, with testing conducted by a FIFA-designated Labosport laboratory.

    VIVATURF also reports that China National Inspection and Testing Holding Group issued its VRG recyclable non-infill artificial turf system an “Easy-to-Recycle” artificial turf certificate.

    These developments position VIVATURF not simply as an artificial grass manufacturer, but as a company focusing on the intersection of non-infill technology, sports performance, recyclability and international market requirements.

    For European and North American buyers, that combination can be particularly relevant as synthetic sports surfaces increasingly face demands for lower environmental impact, better end-of-life management and documented product performance.

  • How to Verify an Environmental Certification

    A certificate alone is not enough. Buyers should check five things.

    1. Check the issuing organization

    Confirm whether the document comes from:

    • An accredited testing laboratory
    • An official certification organization
    • A recognized international standards body
    • A relevant sports governing organization

    2. Check the exact product

    The report should identify the actual turf model, yarn, backing and relevant system components.

    A test report for one product should not automatically be used to represent every product manufactured by the same company.

    3. Check the test date

    Environmental and chemical testing should be sufficiently current for the procurement project.

    This is particularly important when the manufacturer has changed:

    • Yarn formulation
    • Backing materials
    • Adhesives
    • Additives
    • Manufacturing processes

    4. Check the complete system

    For a sports installation, don’t test only the grass yarn.

    The complete system may include:

    Yarn + primary backing + secondary backing + coating/adhesive + shock pad + seam materials + other installation components.

    The environmental performance of the finished installation can therefore differ from that of the yarn alone.

    5. Check recyclability claims separately

    “Recyclable” should ideally be supported by information about:

    • Material composition
    • Separation technology
    • Recycling process
    • Recycled output
    • Third-party certification or verification

  • European and American Technical Benchmarks

    For an international project, I recommend replacing a simple “Chinese standard = European standard” approach with a performance-based specification.

    A practical procurement specification could include:

    Environmental categoryRecommended international approach
    Restricted substancesREACH/SVHC screening or applicable destination-market requirements
    Heavy metalsThird-party chemical analysis according to the relevant international test method
    PAHsTest against applicable European/international restricted-substance limits
    PhthalatesTest against applicable REACH/product-specific restrictions
    VOC emissionsReport measured TVOC and formaldehyde emissions with test method
    Product safetyIndependent laboratory test of the finished turf system
    RecyclabilityDocument material composition and end-of-life recycling route
    Recycled contentDeclare percentage and source where applicable
    UV/weather resistanceAccelerated weathering and post-aging performance testing
    Mechanical durabilityAbrasion, yarn tensile strength and tuft withdrawal testing
    Football performanceFIFA Quality Programme testing where professional football certification is required

    This approach is more suitable for international buyers because it avoids presenting one national standard as if it were automatically equivalent to a European or American regulation.

    What About FIFA Certification?

    FIFA certification should also be understood correctly.

    FIFA Quality and FIFA Quality Pro are football-pitch quality marks rather than standalone “environmental certifications.”

    FIFA’s football-turf programme evaluates the complete playing system, including playing performance, safety, durability and quality assurance. Both laboratory and field testing are involved. FIFA Quality Pro represents the higher performance level intended for professional football.

    The current FIFA framework also recognizes the development of non-filled systems and incorporates sustainability-related considerations, including requirements concerning recycled content in yarn.

    This is significant for the future development of non-infill artificial turf: environmental performance is increasingly being considered alongside traditional performance indicators rather than treated as a completely separate issue.

    For major European competitions, FIFA Quality Pro certification can also become a practical requirement. For example, current UEFA competition regulations specify FIFA Quality Pro for artificial turf used in certain UEFA competitions.